I lost two home games in a row, are the Pacers too strong or are the Knicks too weak?

The Pacers won another away game in the Eastern Conference Finals and have won two away games in a row. In the history of the NBA playoffs, the probability of final advancement is as high as 85%. In the Western Conference semi-finals last season, the Timberwolves won two away games first, and finally advanced with twists and turns, mainly because they won two away games first. This advantage is really too big!

The next thing you need to keep one home court, the team can get the match point. This huge psychological advantage will make the players extremely relaxed in their mentality. In addition, the Pacers's playing style is the same as the soldiers, and the game will not collapse because of one or two people's inaccuracy. Therefore, it can be said that after winning two away games first, the Pacers have basically locked a ticket to the finals!

15 years ago, Carlisle led the Mavericks who did not have the second leader Carlo Butler. He was the most powerful man on the other side of the road and finally killed the Heat, the Heat, which made the most legendary championship journey in recent years. Although the number one hero at that time was Nowitzki, Carlisle's coaching level has always been at a very high level, and he is extremely good at defeating the strong with the weak. This year, defeating the No. 1 Cavaliers in the Eastern Conference this year can be regarded as another representative work of his career as a weak defeating the strong. If he can lead this Pacers to the finals, it can be said that it is no less than leading the Mavericks to win the championship, because the Mavericks were still supported by the top basic board like Nowitzki. The current Pacers are completely a team that is full of soldiers. No player is the main player. He can lead such a team to the finals. Carlisle's coaching level is amazing!

And the Knicks seem to be full of superstars, but their performance is extremely unstable. They can defeat the defending champion and are forced into a desperate situation by the Pacers. In the final analysis, this team is actually not as strong as everyone thinks. First of all, Brunson has a short defensive shortcoming, his body is short and his hands are short. This defensive hole is too big. In addition, Towns's franchise protection in the interior and the footsteps of the outside are just average. Therefore, the Knicks' defense is really not very good. In addition, Bridges, who has always been praised, has reached the depths of the playoffs, and the confrontation is too poor and cannot give too much interference to his opponents in defense. This was the case with the Suns back then. He played like a second-in-command in the first round, and he slowly could not give confrontations in the high-end game at all. He is actually not a champion-level player at all!

In the offense, except for Brunson's reliable, other players are all in every way. Towns has always been like this. He can't see him at critical moments. After many years, many people still have fantasies about Towns and think that his data is good. In fact, he is a real data brush. When you provide timely help in the high-end game, you don't have to count on him. The three-pointer in the wind is making a comeback, which is stronger than Curry. Such a player is really useless! Of course, my standard is based on the finals championship level. In terms of low-end games and regular season, Towns is still easy to use!

Of course, it cannot be said that the Knicks have no chance at all. After all, compared to the Knicks, the Pacers still lack an absolute top card like Brunson. As long as the Knicks can win the game, everything may be in a daze. However, no matter who enters the finals, they will give the Thunder the championship in vain. After all, their shortcomings are too big!