Lin Liangfeng: Remove Bellingham, Tuchel found the 1966 championship formation

. Apart from the left gate and No. 10, there is no substitute for Anderson at No. 6, which is also a hidden danger.

Are Henderson and Loftus-Cheek alternatives? Neither of these brothers plays No. 6. The former played No. 8 when he debuted at Sunderland, and the latter, as the first princeling representative of Chelsea, played No. 10. But there are indeed people in the Premier League who specialize in playing No. 6. Crystal Palace's Walton withdrew from training due to injury in September. Tuchel comforted him at the time: You are qualified to be selected. I hope you will have better luck next time. There was no Wharton in the recruitment of troops in October. Perhaps Tuchel made it clear that he would not break his promise to retain the lineup for September. The rallying call will be blown next month. It should be Tuchel's decision whether Walton will report to the national team.

Condensing Tuchel's six World Cup qualifying games into a few minutes template, you will find that England's overall playing style does not have a No. 10. Kane retreats and becomes the No. 10. Saka and Gordon cut inside to form a double forward, and the wings are handed over to the full-backs who are inserted, and the rhythm and direction are controlled by Rice. Isn't this routine a 1966 style? Kane was Bobby Charlton back then. After retreating into the midfield, the forwards became Hurst and Hunter. Ball and Peters, who were originally wingers, moved in to protect Charlton. Wilson and Cohen stepped in to take over the task of the winger's cross. As a friendly reminder, Wilson, the left back, is not left-handed.

Mini-game recommendations:Street Car Escape